How are you building this? With HTML or the input brics?
You can set all the warning text with attributes. I had a video up on better forms. But I hide it for now as I’ll make a series of shorter ones as it was all one video. Rather long lol.
yeah, for the matter of the option field, I already set as required, but on design mode shows what I expected (not validated) but as I start the preview mode ( as in the imaged uploaded first) shows validated.
@goncalves_daniel, here is the unlisted link. There is probably a lot more that could added here. I might start making short videos like the Better Buttons series… (I have some more buttons to video soon.)
Shameless plug… Don’t forget to subscribe exclusive content and tutorials you won’t get anywhere else.
Thank you. I didn’t realise until today, how the zoom failed on export at some points in the video. I think it was a bug in an earlier version of ScreenFlow. Oh well.
I created a form where I applied the bootstrap .is-invalid class. This works perfectly, but when I want to apply the .form-select class next to it, the icon for .is-invalid is messed up, and the arrow icon for .form-select is not visible either.
Can someone help with this, what would be the solution to make both icons visible?
I’ve looked at these and there’s basically nothing wrong with them.
It shows each icon perfectly separately, but if I load the two classes at the same time, the form-select arrow disappears and the is-invalid icon becomes small.
I opened a completely empty project, there was nothing in it, and it did the same thing there.
What happens is a Blocs problem, that @norm will have to address, I am sure I have mentioned it before.
Blocs is adding .form-control to every field, but select fields should have .form-select not .form-control applied to them (BS docs).
Until Norm addresses that, you could use a script that looks for any select tags, and replaces .form-control with .form-select, that would look like this.
I checked what you said and couldn’t find anything that would cause the error.
But thank you for the detailed explanation, so what you wrote was completely understandable to me.